Gambia’s President Barrow VS Africa on ICC withdrawal

President Barrow handed his first test on the continent as his position on International Criminal Court contradicts his colleagues’ barely a month after assuming leadership in his country.  

KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

Gambia’s president Adama Barrow

President Adama Barrow has praised the International Criminal Court as an institution that stands for rule of law and good governance while his colleagues in the just concluded African Summit in Ethiopia have reached a non-binding decision for mass pullout.

The pro-ICC president of mainland Africa’s smallest nation, The Gambia, could not attend the summit due to the post-election crisis that rocked his country but was represented by his vice president Fatoumata Jallow Tambajang.

Barrow was backed by seven opposition groupings all of whom were very critical of ex-president Yahya Jammeh’s decision to pull the country out of ICC on claims that it targets Africans.

African leaders on Tuesday adopted a strategy calling for a collective withdrawal from the war crimes court. The non-binding decision came behind closed doors near the end of an African Union summit.

It was the latest expression of impatience by African leaders with the court, which some say has focused too narrowly on Africa while pursuing cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Late last year, South Africa, Burundi and The Gambia have all placed letters of intent with the UN secretary general to leave the court, leading to concerns that other states would follow.

However, Barrow told Journalists last week at his residence that he sees no logic in pulling out of ICC.

“We came to power on promises of good governance, rule of law and democracy and that is what ICC advocates… I don’t think we should pull out of ICC,” he said.

Desire Assogbavi, head of Oxfam International’s liaison office to the AU, confirmed the adoption of the strategy. A source close to the continental body’s legal council also confirmed it, saying countries had been divided on whether to call for leaving the court individually or together.

The source said the majority of countries also wanted the meaning of immunity and impunity amended in the Rome Statute, the treaty that set up the court in 2002. The source spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

Some African countries have been especially critical of the ICC for pursuing heads of state. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has been wanted by the court since 2009 for allegedly orchestrating atrocities in Darfur.

The ICC also caused an uproar among some African nations by indicting Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta on charges of crimes against humanity for 2007 post-election violence in which more than 1,000 died.

The case collapsed because of what the ICC prosecutor called lack of co-operation by Kenya’s government.

Elise Keppler with Human Rights Watch’s international justice program said the ICC withdrawal strategy has no timeline and “few concrete recommendations for action.” She pointed out that several African countries, including Nigeria, Senegal and Congo, have spoken up in support of the ICC in recent months.

A draft of the strategy, obtained by The Associated Press, recommends that African countries strengthen their own judicial mechanisms and expand the jurisdiction of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights “in order to reduce the deference to the ICC.”

 

Advertisements

Share your response with others

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s